Travis Scott Faces Lawsuit for Presumed Copyright Violations on ‘Stargazing’ and ‘Til Further Notice’

Travis Scott, a popular hip-hop artist, has been served with a lawsuit for alleged copyright infringement related to two of his songs, “Stargazing” and “Til Further Notice”. The plaintiffs in this case are Dion Norman, a songwriter from New Orleans, CEO of Free World Entertainment, and a journalist at The Heat Magazine, and Derrick “Mellow Fellow” Ordogne, a rap producer known for his work in the 1990s.

The plaintiffs allege that Scott’s songs “Stargazing” (released in 2018) and “Til Further Notice” (released in 2023) contain unauthorized samples from a track that Norman and Ordogne co-created in 1991, titled “Bitches (Reply)”. This track was featured on DJ Jimi’s 1992 album “It’s Jimi”. Notably, “Til Further Notice” has nearly 93 million listens on Spotify and has been played 6.9 million times on YouTube.

Producers Metro Boomin and James Blake, Sony Music Entertainment, and Scott’s own label, Cactus Jack Records, are also named as defendants in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants acknowledged the unauthorized use of their track when they contacted them through a sample clearance vendor after the release of Scott’s album, “Utopia”, to clear the sample.

“Bitches (Reply)” is widely recognized in the rap and hip-hop community, having been sampled in multiple songs by artists such as Beyonce, Wiz Khalifa, Lil Wayne, Kid Cudi, and Nelly. The plaintiffs are seeking compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages for the alleged copyright infringement, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs associated with the lawsuit.

This is not the first time Scott has faced allegations of copyright infringement. In 2019, he resolved a lawsuit filed by DJ Paul over similarities between Scott’s “Astroworld” track “No Bystanders” and Three 6 Mafia‘s 1997 track “Tear Da Club Up”. In 2020, he was taken to court by a group of musicians who claimed that Scott’s 2019 hit “Highest In The Room” plagiarized their own song, “Cartier”. However, the case was dismissed by a California District Court judge in 2021 at the request of both parties.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *